ELEMENT
  • SINGLE-SIDED AMM
    • Introduction
    • Limitations of DeFi 1.0
    • Our Solution
    • Element VS DeFi 1.0 Stableswaps
    • DeFi 2.0: Asset-centric VS. Liability-centric Model
    • Coverage Ratio
    • Slippage Optimization
    • Risk Management
    • Conclusion
  • Tau Protocol
    • Introduction
    • Overview
    • Canister
  • TestNet User Guide
    • Stablecoin AMM
      • LP Staking
    • KYC Launchpad
    • NFT Marketplace
      • Normal NFT
      • Fractional NFT
      • Royalty NFT
      • Auction NFT
    • Stablecoin Hub
      • Bond
  • Social Channels
    • GitHub
    • Discord
    • Twitter
    • Medium
    • Reddit
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. SINGLE-SIDED AMM

Coverage Ratio

PreviousDeFi 2.0: Asset-centric VS. Liability-centric ModelNextSlippage Optimization

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?

Through the concept of liabilities, ELEMENT is the first StableSwap to use coverage ratio in its dynamics to delineate equilibrium states. The coverage ratio is a crucial aspect of the ELEMENT protocol that must be maintained above a certain threshold to avoid defaults. For example, the coverage ratio prevents instances where users’ withdrawal requests exceed the number of assets in a token account.

Coverage Ratio = Asset / Liability

In ELEMENT, when a transaction happens, liquidity for the swap-from token increases while liquidity for the swap-to token decreases. ELEMENT also penalizes transactions that diverge from equilibrium to encourage transactions that move the system towards equilibrium through price slippage, a function of the coverage ratio.

Fig 7: the coverage ratio for USDT is 0.909 (1,000/1,100), ETH 1.033 (31/30)